See the DVDs shocking the nation:
When the Darkness Falls: The Racially Divided States of America
---------------
Making Criminals of Christians
---------------
The Line in the Sand: America's Forgotten Borders
---------------
The Persecution of Revisionists: The Holocaust Unveiled
---------------
Zionist War Crimes: The Case for the Prosecution
---------------
Judea Declares War: A Critical Look at WWII
---------------
Understanding Anti-Semitism: Why Do Some People Dislike Jews?
---------------
Rep. Paul Findley Dares to Speak Out: A 22-Year Veteran Congressman Exposes Israel's Lobby
---------------
Ritual Murder Revisited: The Hidden Cult
---------------
Human Sacrifice among the Fanatical Hasidic Jews and Other Cults from Ancient Times to the Present
---------------
---------------
---------------
Slave Trade in the World Today
---------------
---------------
The Whole Story of Zionist Conspiracy
---------------
Michael Collins Piper Live Radio 7-8 PM EST
Politically Incorrect Cartoons
Paul Grubach's Writings on the Holocaust, Etc.
South African/ Zimbabwean Headlines
*****************
(This website is hosted by the above, and supports both Free Speech and America.)
Day 12 of the “Holocaust” Trial of Attorney Sylvia Stolz
In Mannheim District Court, 7 January 2008
Reported by Günter Deckert
Translated by J M Damon
****************
Wer vor Gericht zieht und zur See fährt, braucht Gottes Hilfe.
Wer in einen politischen Prozeß hineingerät, dem kann auch Gott nicht helfen.
He who goes to court or sea needs God’s help, but not even God can help someone caught in a political trial.
(Dr. Siepmann, München)
****************
Today there is only one police car (Mercedes Sprinter) in front of the courthouse and four armed police agents on duty, one of which is female. The Court is meeting in the small courtroom again, with light security and no X-ray searches, only the “magnetic archway.” This group of four officers has gone through this many times and now realizes that the trial visitors are not members of a German Jihad or Al Quaida.
The Court is here in its usual composition including Presiding Judge Glenz, his attending judges, District Attorney Grossmann and Sylvia with her two defense attorneys, one of whom was appointed by the Court and “planted” in the Defense over Sylvia’s objections. There are two uniformed police agents in our courtroom, including the female agent. There are no “Staschu” (political police) agents in the courtroom today. The crowd is very large, with four media reporters, including the “dpa lady” (Deutsche Presse Agentur). They are expecting that the “BRDDR” government through Grossmann will announce its desired range of punishments for Sylvia, who defended her Revisionist clients much too vigorously. There is a “full house” of visitors, including Horst Mahler and Andreas K. from Berlin. Six visitors have to wait outside, since Judge Glenz has denied Sylvia’s and Attorney Bock’s request to meet in the larger courtroom or at least allow visitors to take the empty front row seats reserved for the press. Scheduled for 9:30, today’s session gets under way at 9:34.
Sylvia and Attorney Bock begin by submitting a motion that the visitors who have no seats be allowed to sit in vacant seats reserved for the press. Judge Glenz denies this motion, as he has denied all the Defense motions. They then demand a ruling by the panel of judges, who of course follow the leader. Glenz gives changes in security procedures as the reason for his rejection. However, he suggests the possibility of moving to the large courtroom after lunch, in view of the anticipated increase in the number of visitors.
Then, in a barely audible voice, Glenz announces that in addition to the charges listed against Sylvia in her indictment, the Court is now adding Sylvia’s “coercion” against 5 persons. {This has to do with Sylvia’s pointing out at beginning of the trial that under international law, the laws of the Reich are still in effect, since no peace treaty was ever signed and no new constitution written and approved by the German Nation in plebiscite. Under wartime 1944 laws, “anti German activities” are punishable by death. It is clear that the vassal “BRDDR” government is reacting to Sylvia’s pointing out its lack of legitimacy. I’ll ask Horst Mahler more about this tomorrow.}
After dictating his announcement to the court historian, Glenz asks
the Defense if they have any additional motions or requests that he can deny. {He is referring, not to new motions, but rather to Sylvia’s Gegendarstellungen (responses and objections) to some of the motions he has denied. This official procedure is allowed following the termination of the trial phase of submitting motions and gathering evidence.}
At 9:35, Sylvia announces that she wishes to speak concerning her Gegendarstellung to Glenz’s “muzzle” ruling that forbade her to continue questioning Dr. Meinerzhagen (“Judge Nein.”) Glenz, acting stressed and irritated, demands that Sylvia submit her response in writing. {Between 9:00 and 9:30 am, Court had conducted a trial of three drug smugglers, two ex–Yugoslavs and a Turk, very exotic, with very large amounts of money involved. The trial had highlighted the present state of German society, which might help explain the judge’s nervousness.} Sylvia assures him that her response has nothing to do with “Holocaust” but Glenz still insists on a written Gegendarstellung and refers to the “muzzle” ruling of the Court. Sylvia now has to give in. She presents her written Gegendarstellung with the comment “now you are even afraid of a little correction.” To this Glenz snaps back, “just give it to me!” Attorney Bock then intervenes in support of Sylvia and observes that the public has the right to hear the correction.
But Glenz prefers to treat his directive as “expediting the proceedings.”
He continues unrelenting and at 9:37 announces a ten-minute recess. He allows the visitors to remain in the courtroom, however. After recess Glenz announces “The answer is still NEIN!” Everything must be submitted in written form, with no exceptions, exactly as previously decreed. Sylvia insists on delivering a response to this ruling and demands another recess. Glenz allows 15 minutes and allows the audience may remain in the courtroom. After that, Attorney Bock then demands a decision by the Court on the empty chairs in the first row. At 10:10 Glenz announces an additional recess of 10 minutes. This interruption does not last long, the ruling is of course NEIN. At 10:22 there is another recess so the Court can confer on an another Gegendarstellung. Attorney Bock is allowed to present this one orally, since the Court has not muzzled him.
The Court’s decision is that it sees no reason to change its ruling.
Next, Sylvia submits another written Gegendarstellung for a ruling on her attempted questioning of the witness Judge Meinerzhagen on 11 December 2007. She wants to read into the record additional documents regarding Judge Meinerzhagen’s “bending” or violating procedural rules during the Zündel trial. Glenz’s immediate reply is “NEIN!” Everything must be submitted in writing! No exceptions!
The Court sees no reason for a new decision!
It is clear to everyone that Glenz is growing more and more surly and despotic, and the other judges are following suit. It is obvious that all they want to do is terminate the trial and ram through their verdict, which they have known from the beginning. Sylvia has done a thorough job of exposing the trial as a travesty, and they are keenly aware that they have “made monkeys of themselves” as Sylvia pointed out to Glenz. There is more busy whispering between Glenz and Dr. Bock the Court Reporter (not to be confused with Defense Attorney Bock.) It is significant that the whispering is always between these two, never including the other judges. During a lull Sylvia is heard to say “This has been a most unusual trial,” which evokes loud laughter from the public. Glenz scowls warningly at the public but takes no action. {Dr. Meinerzhaen, “Judge Nein,” would have hit the ceiling long ago. He would have ordered the police to identify the persons who laughed and either ejected them from the courtroom or fined them for disorderly conduct.}
At 10:32 Sylvia submits a written Gegendarstellung regarding Judge Meinerzhagen’s violations of trial procedure, remarking in Glenz’s direction: “You will be held responsible for everything you are doing here.” Glenz asks: “What do you mean by that?” and Sylvia replies:
“Just what I say.” Next, Sylvia submits another Gegendarstellung, not related to the subject of “Holocaust” but rather to the Court ruling of 29 November 2007, concerning the Court’s disallowing her to continue presenting her defense statement. Glenz says repeatedly “Hand it over.” Sylvia: “This is a correction, because the facts are misrepresented in the official record.” Glenz: “Hand it over right now!” Sylvia: “You are repeating yourself just like you do when rejecting evidentiary motions,” which evokes more loud laughter from the public. Glenz does not react to this, but Court Reporter Bock is noticeably growing “antsy” and beginning to “boil.” Despite Glenz’s repeated “Hand it over!” Sylvia does not allow herself to be distracted and continues to present her arguments. Then she begins expounding on the illegality of Section 130 of the Penal Code. Glenz counters with “submit it in writing!” and he and Court Reporter Bock begin whispering again. At 10:43 Glenz calls a recess until 12:00 so the Court can “take under advisement” the 100 pages or so of the written motions Sylvia has handed in.
The media reporters immediately crowd around Grossmann and begin asking questions. {Reporter Mack of the Mannheimer Morgen is not present today, and someone else is presumably taking his place. During the last recess I had noticed a reporter whose face was familiar to me from earlier trials, and I now ask him if he is filling in for Mack of the Mannheimer Morgen. His answer is an abrupt, “That’s none of your business.” Horst Mahler who happens to be standing nearby, seems surprised and asks, “Why don’t you want to tell?” And he answers: “Because I don’t want to get on anybody’s Abschußliste (hit list).” Horst and I, puzzled, ask “What are you talking about?” Then this weird character says, “You want to have us all shot.” Horst remarks reflectively, “Apparently you believe those fairy tales you make up and spread.” Unfortunately there is no article in the Mannheimer Morgen on the “Hour of the D. A.,” so I cannot get the name of the reporter. I’ll have to file a complaint against an unknown person. I am curious to see how the Political Section of the Mannheim District Attorney’s Office (Grossmann) will treat this little incident, which lasted about five minutes.}
Despite the long recess, we still do not have to leave the courtroom while the judges “take under advisement” Sylvia’s written Gegendarstellungen. Maybe Glenz forgot to order it cleared, in his agitated state. Sylvia and Attorney Bock remain in the courtroom and confer, while Horst and I also stay and “talk shop.” At 12:05 the judges return. Now there are only three reporters present, including the blonde from the dpa. Amost as soon as Glenz sits down, he announces a midday recess until 3:00 pm. The three media reporters again hurl themselves at District Attorney Grossmann, and
I also walk up to him and ask if he expects to still “get on board the train” this afternoon. He answers that there is a “fifty-fifty chance” –- quite politely, not diffidently and not harshly. This suggests that, as far as personal bearing and demeanor are concerned, he might not be so bad.
Because of a pressing engagement in Weinheim I have to leave at 3:00 pm. I did not personally experience what happened after that, but Attorney Bock told me about it during a telephone conversation. The proceedings resumed shortly after 3:00 pm, and Glenz announced rejection of two of Sylvia’s Gegenvorstellungen, for the familiar reasons. He said that the Court had not yet finished discussing the others, and would present its rulings tomorrow morning at 9:00 am.
****************
Please note that my reports on the Stolz trial are neither a simultaneous transcription nor a complete account of everything that was said. They reflect my personal impressions as I experienced them. I ask that whoever refers to these reports, in whole or in part, include my name as the author. Please consider that compiling these reports takes at least four hours of my time. Driving to and from Mannheim takes even longer and in addition, costs considerable money. I can donate my time, but money is very scarce. Every trip to Mannheim including gasoline, parking and a light lunch costs me around 35 Euros. If you are able to make a small contribution to help offset these expenses, I ask that you transfer the amount to: Konto 134345-754/G. Deckert – Postbank KA, BLZ 660 100 75, Vermerk „LG MA/SSt.“
Many thanks to Bill H. in the USA for his contribution to my expenses.
Günter Deckert
Weinheim an der Bergstraße, den 7. January 2008, 22.15 Uhr