See the DVDs shocking the nation:
When the Darkness Falls: The Racially Divided States of America
---------------
Making Criminals of Christians
---------------
The Line in the Sand: America's Forgotten Borders
---------------
The Persecution of Revisionists: The Holocaust Unveiled
---------------
Zionist War Crimes: The Case for the Prosecution
---------------
Judea Declares War: A Critical Look at WWII
---------------
Understanding Anti-Semitism: Why Do Some People Dislike Jews?
---------------
Rep. Paul Findley Dares to Speak Out: A 22-Year Veteran Congressman Exposes Israel's Lobby
---------------
Ritual Murder Revisited: The Hidden Cult
---------------
Human Sacrifice among the Fanatical Hasidic Jews and Other Cults from Ancient Times to the Present
---------------
---------------
---------------
Slave Trade in the World Today
---------------
---------------
The Whole Story of Zionist Conspiracy
---------------
Michael Collins Piper Live Radio 7-8 PM EST
Politically Incorrect Cartoons
Paul Grubach's Writings on the Holocaust, Etc.
South African/ Zimbabwean Headlines
*****************
(This website is hosted by the above, and supports both Free Speech and America.)
Day 6 of the “Holocaust” Trial of Attorney Sylvia Stolz
in Mannheim District Court, 29 November 2007.
****************
Reported by Günter Deckert
Translated by J. M. Damon
Sylvia the Proud
What’s in a name? Quite a lot, especially if you are a Bavarian attorney and your name is Sylvia Stolz. “Stolz” means “proud” in German, and that describes Sylvia very well: proud and undaunted.
In the face of disbarment and imprisonment for defending Revisionist thought criminals, her head is bloody but unbowed. No wonder her supporters call her “the German Joan of Arc.”
****************
Scheduled for 9 am, proceedings begin at 9:05 in a smaller courtroom. Two police
vehicles are parked in front of the courthouse. There are the usual security
checks with x-ray equipment, etc. The other courtrooms in Mannheim Court House
do not carry out such security checks, but this one is used to conduct trials
for violent crimes, grievous bodily harm, drugs, etc. Eight policemen are
present along with three Staschu (Staatschutz: political police,
today’s counterpart of the Stasi from DDR days) and one bailiff. The
court in its usual composition: Judge Glenz, District Attorney Grossmann and
Sylvia Stolz with Attorney Bock as well as her court appointed lawyer. Horst
Mahler is present as visitor. There is one very young female reporter from the
dpa (Deutsche Presse-Agentur.) The media are boycotting the trial except
for passing on politically correct clichés such as “Rightwing Extremist,”
“Holocaust Denier,” “Neo-Nazi,” etc. There are also several very young female
observers, perhaps students or interns. In addition there are around 30 visitors
who come and go throughout the day. They are exasperated because the sound
system is either out of order or turned off for the day, making it impossible to
hear what is said. In addition, Judge Glenz is speaking more softly than
usual.The visitors have to listen very attentively to hear anything at all, and
for that reason the courtroom is remarkably quiet.
The proceedings begin with a brief dispute between Sylvia and Judge Glenz over
his most recent ruling. He tells her that he sees no reason to change his
decision. Attorney Bock contradicts him, pointing out in detail that he is
constantly interrupting Sylvia and refusing to allow her to speak, which is
unworthy of a court in a lawful society. At 9:10 the Court recesses to confer
and resumes at 9:40. Previous to this, Sylvia made a motion that she be
reimbursed for travel expenses, since she no longer has a source of income. The
Court’s decision: Nein!
Sylvia makes the observation that the Court is doing everything it can to silence her. She points out that harboring doubts about “Holocaust” is now a thought crime in Germany. She again alludes to the never-ending occupation and domination by Gerfmany’s World War II enemies and observes that today the Jews rule all nations everywhere through their vassals. Racial mixing, which the Jews acrtively promote for everyone except themselves, means the extinction of European ethnicity, while phony Jewish “democracy” and the perverted Jewish version of “human rights” (except for the rights of freedom of speech and opinion) result in bondage and Jewish rule: they are in fact Jewish inventions.
Sylvia points out that in every nation, the Jews have created a state within a state, with non Jews serving as Nutzvieh (livestock). This is well demonstrated in Jewish laws and literature. She again quotes extensively from Jewish writings in support of Jewish supremacism, then she reminds the Court that it would not allow her to read from the speech of Harold Pinter, a Jewish winner of the Nobel Prize and an outspoken critic of Zionist American Imperialism. Perhaps the following is the passage that Sylvia wished to quote in order to illustrate the nature of Zionist American hegemony:
****************
I have said earlier that the United States is now totally frank about putting its cards on the table. That is the case. Its official declared policy is now defined as 'full spectrum dominance'. That is not my term, it is theirs. 'Full spectrum dominance' means control of land, sea, air and space and all attendant resources. The United States now occupies 702 military installations throughout the world in 132 countries, with the honorable exception of Sweden, of course. We don't quite know how they got there but they are there all right. The United States possesses 8,000 active and operational nuclear warheads. Two thousand are on hair trigger alert, ready to be launched with 15 minutes warning. The US is still developing new systems of nuclear weapons, known as bunker busters. The British, ever cooperative, are intending to replace their own nuclear missile, Trident. Who, I wonder, are they aiming at? Osama bin Laden? You? Me? Joe Dokes? China? Paris? Who knows? What we do know is that this infantile insanity - the possession and threatened use of nuclear weapons - is at the heart of present American political philosophy. We must remind ourselves that the United States is on a permanent military footing and shows no sign of relaxing it. Many thousands, if not millions, of people in the United States itself are demonstrably sickened, shamed and angered by their government's actions, but as things stand they are not a coherent political force - yet. But the anxiety, uncertainty and fear, which we can see growing daily in the United States, is unlikely to diminish.
****************
Sylvia then moves on to ask a question that also has also puzzed her
supporters: if the Court is so intent on expediting proceedings and avoiding
“circumlocutions”, why did it set aside 20 days on the court calendar for this
show trial? Judge Glenz reprimands Sylvia, saying that her presentation does not
reflect the disapproval expressed by the Court. She denies this and reminds the
Court that this is the 3rd day of her defense presentation, therefore she cannot
be interrupted and her testimony cannot be shortened or abrogated. She says it
has become obvious that the honorable presiding judge is not concerned about the
length of her presentation, but rather its contents. Judge Glenz
allows her to continue. She points out that people have a right to know what the
expression “human rights” means to the Jews: it means the total plundering and
exploitation of non Jews and the imposition of Talmudic supremacism.
At 9:46 Judge Glenz again interrupts Sylvia and announces that he is now
imposing a time limit on her presentations: he definitively and conclusively
forbids her to continue speaking. She ignores his ultimatum and continues
introducing exhibits regarding the recent decision of the Spanish High Court
decriminalizing dissenting opinions about “Holocaust.” She points out that the
Spanish decision is posted on the Internet for all to read, and expresses the
hope that her motions and exhibits will help the Mannheim District Court reach a
proper verdict. Sylvia and Attorney Bock both rebuke the court for constantly
retreating to chambers to confer. The Court does not have to recess for a
conference; the judges can discuss Sylvia’s motions in the courtroom. Sylvia and
Bock demand an open and proper ruling by the judges.
Since Sylvia is no longer allowed to give oral testimony, but only to submit
written documents, the attendant judge on the right of Judge Glenz asks Sylvia
what sort documents she wishes to submit. Sylvia then hands over two large files
of copies as well as two packets containing copies of Germar Rudolf’s “Lectures
on the Holocaust” [posted on the Internet at
<www.vho.org/GB/Books/loth/#download>].
The
Court recesses from 10:30 until 11.07.
After recess the Court announces that Sylvia will be limited in her defense to two hours, which may be extended at the pleasure of the Court. Judge Glenz then gives an oral summarization of Sylvia’s testimony, mentioning Jewish domination of Germany; “Holocaust” and the reasons why she doubts its authenticity; forensic evidence that “Holocaust” could not have occurred as officially promulgated; “OMF” and the foundations of Germany’s present Basic Law; the Talmudic assumption that only Jews are human and non Jews are mere animals; and the function of the United Nations in eliminating national characteristics, with the result that today’s young Germans have been brainwashed into no longer wanting to be German. At 11:26 Judge Glenz finishes reading the Court’s “muzzle” ruling and orders copies to be distributed to individual members of the Court. Concerning Sylvia’s motion for compensation for travel expenses now, the judge remarks that she must fill out applications and submit documentations for expenses.
Sylvia explains to the Court that she is faced with an entirely new situation, since she has been limited to two hours in which to present her case. As the Court well knows, this is an impossible task. Attorney Bock makes the motion that proceedings be discontinued and the Court adjourned for the day, since the Defense needs time to confer and reorganize. Judge Glenz totally ignores his motion. At 11:33 he orders a two hour recess for the noonday meal. After that, events move very quickly. After lunch, Judge Glenz informs Sylvia that compensation for travel expenses is available only for destitute persons. She will have to fill out written applications and provide documentation.
Sylvia complains about the Court’s muzzle order restricting her presentation to two hours. She points out that placing an arbitrary time limit on her argumentation, after having set aside 20 days for her trial, is an unjust and illegal denial of her right to present her case. It is in fact Talmudic denial of her right to defend herself. She observes that Judge Glenz lives in the Judaic world whereas she lives in the German world. She observes that in the Mannheim court the District Attorney does not have to lift a finger in order to gain convictions, since the judge conducts the prosecution. It is the same situation that prevailed in the Allied military tribunal in Nuremberg, in which the American Judge Jackson refused to allow Hermann Goering to speak. She defiantly announces that, since two hours are totally inadequate for the presentation of her defense, she is granting these two hours to the Right Honorable Presiding Judge to use as he sees fit! At 1:42 pm the Court again recesses for 5 minutes to confer, then announces the end of proceedings for the day.
Sylvia’s trial will continue on Tuesday, December 4th at 9:00 am, at which time, in accordance with Section 249 of the Penal Code, it will take evidence in Selbstleseverfahren (reading into the official court record, since German courts do not keep transcripts of everything that is said.) These witnesses will be called: Presiding Judge Meinerzhagen, the specialist in “Holocaust Denial” who conducted Ernst Zündel’s trial; and a female judge from Berlin who presided over a case in which Sylvia represented the defense.
****************
Some observations by your reporter:
During today’s proceedings it became very clear that Judge Glenz is “pulling out all the stops” in order to terminate this trial as quickly as possible. The brief mention in the issue of 30 November of Manheimer Morgen, on page 3, is representative of the coverage of Sylvia’s trial in Germany’s “poodle press:”
Stolz Trial to Move Forward
The trial of Sylvia Stolz in Mannheim District Court for Incitement of the Masses will now continue with normal witness testimony. On the fifth trial day, Judge Rolf Glenz repeatedly warned the accused to restrict her testimony to the points of her indictment. Yesterday Stolz, an attorney who has defended several Rightwing Extremists, continued repeating the Holocaust Lie, however. Judge Glenz finally limited her testimony to two hours, which Stolz then refused to accept.
Notice that I wrote this report today based on descriptions by a friend who attended the trial, to whom I am very grateful. As I mentioned previously, I myself was unable to attend this session. I returned last night shortly before 12 pm from the Deutsches Haus in Erzgebirge to find 240 messages in my computer, in addition to this report.
These reports on the Stolz trial are neither a simultaneous transcription nor a complete account of everything that was said. They reflect my personal impressions as I experienced them. I ask that whoever refers to these reports, in whole or in part, include my name as the author.
Please consider that compiling these reports takes at least four hours of my time. Driving to and from Mannheim takes even longer and in addition, costs considerable money. I can donate my time but money is very scarce. Every trip to Mannheim including gasoline, parking and a light lunch costs me around 35 Euros. If you are able to make a small contribution to help offset these expenses, I ask that you transfer the amount to: Konto 134345-754/G. Deckert – Postbank KA, BLZ 660 100 75, Vermerk „LG MA/SSt.“
Thanks!
****************
Günter Deckert
Weinheim an der Bergstraße, den 2. Dezember 2007
OTHER
DAYS OF TRIAL